Think about the psychological difference between making a £1 and a £100,000 payment.

Only one would make you physically sweat.

Very different emotions and behaviours—yet most banks offer a single interface. 

Weird when you think about it, right?

Why isn't it more common to show dynamic "anti-anxiety" context to users who are making large transfers?

Even something as simple as this:

I doubt many people sending £100,000 would opt for efficiency over clarity.

So why not experiment with adding even more friction when making very large payments?

For example, an optional challenge to make users more comfortable.

However, that doesn't mean you can't control it. People are incredibly perceptive to subtle signs of disorder.

This is why one of these checkouts feels less comfortable to use.

Now take that familiar design, and consider the difference that simply misaligning the CTA label makes.

Think about the psychological difference between making a £1 and a £100,000 payment.

Only one would make you physically sweat.

Very different emotions and behaviours—yet most banks offer a single interface. 

Weird when you think about it, right?

Why isn't it more common to show dynamic "anti-anxiety" context to users who are making large transfers?

Even something as simple as this:

I doubt many people sending £100,000 would opt for efficiency over clarity.

So why not experiment with adding even more friction when making very large payments?

For example, an optional challenge to make users more comfortable.

However, that doesn't mean you can't control it. People are incredibly perceptive to subtle signs of disorder.

This is why one of these checkouts feels less comfortable to use.

Now take that familiar design, and consider the difference that simply misaligning the CTA label makes.