😮💨
The internal discomfort of holding conflicting opinions.
Featured in 14 UX Bites
Similar psychology:
When someone turns on a protective setting, you could let them write a note to their future self, shown if they try to turn it off, so undoing it clashes with their own words.

Try opening the front camera when someone tries to break a limit they set themselves, so they have to face the dissonance between their goal and what they're doing.

When asking for personal details, it may help to play back what they mean, e.g., showing someone their age from their birth date, so an untrue entry feels harder to hold.

During sign-up, one option is to ask people to sign their name as a commitment to use the product regularly, so skipping it later clashes with a promise they remember.

Consider replacing a plain 'Continue' button with a playful fist bump to seal a commitment, so moving on feels like agreeing to a pact, not just a tap.

Asking users to make a memorable commitment early on could reduce churn, as giving up later would clash with the promise they made to themselves.
It's possible that users who've made a clear pledge build habits more easily, as skipping a day creates dissonance with the kind of person they said they'd be.
Prompting users to commit as they start something might increase use of related features like reminders, since ignoring them would clash with that commitment.
Making people face their own rules or notes when undoing them may increase discomfort, which could protect them but might feel frustrating if overused.
Turning a commitment into a playful gesture, e.g., a fist bump, might make onboarding feel more enjoyable while still sealing a pact users may later feel bound to.
Playing back what someone has entered, e.g., their age, could improve data accuracy, as an untrue detail stated plainly creates dissonance that makes lying harder.