By Peter Ramsey

3 Nov 22

Lessons from the Flaws of an Advertising Giant Company Logo
Google•7 min read•
Listen

Lessons from the Flaws of an Advertising Giant

Lessons from the Flaws of an Advertising Giant Featured Image

The scale of Google's ad platform is mind-blowing. 

Last year, revenue from ads surpassed $200 billion, from more than 1.2 million businesses worldwide.

For Google, decreasing the churn on their ad platform by even 0.1% could generate millions of dollars—creating a strong incentive to optimise.

At this scale, you'd expect Google to have an ad experience so refined that it was comparable to modern art.

Instead, it's flawed, inconsistent and a demonstration that operating at a large scale can create inefficiencies. Everybody can reduce churn somewhere.

Let's jump right in.

Case study

Please rotate your device to view this slideshow

Note, this won’t work if ‘rotate: lock’ is on in your device settings.
275410
275411
275412
275413
275414
275415
275416
275417
275418
275419
275420
275421
275422
275423
275424
275425
275426
275427
275428
275429
275430
275431
275432
275433
275434
275435
275436
275437
275438
275439
275440
275441
275442
275443
275444
275445
275446
275447
275448
275449
275450
275451
275452
275453
275454
275455
275456
275457
275458
275459
275460
275461
275462
275463
275464
275465
275466
275467
275468
275469
275470
275471
275472
275473
275474
275475
275476
275477
275478
275479
275480
275481
275482
275483
275484
275485
275486
275487
275488
275489
275490
275491
275492
275493
275494
275495
275496
275497
275498
275499
275500
275501
275502
275503
275504
275505
275506
275507
275508
275509

👇

That’s all for the slideshow, but there’s more content and key takeaways below.

Slide 1 of 101

4 key takeaways

1. Fuzzy context

Imagine that after ordering a coke, the waiter asks: "What size glass do you want? This is just for our notes".

I'd describe this as fuzzy context—it does provide more information, but creates unwanted ambiguity.

The waiter failed to mention that they're participating in an anonymous research survey, and the diner can opt-out. The innocence of the data collection is shrouded by a fuzzy haze of unanswered questions.

Hence the term; 🐨 Fuzzy Context.

Google are doing this with the following subtitle (the small text below the field):

null image

"Does this mean that I'm paying to advertise when searching for my own business name? Can I turn this off later? Are these keyword clicks included in my estimated CPC? Do I put my business name or my trading name?"

I see this all the time on sign-up flows. 

Companies will introduce a concept too early (such as the need to verify their ID), but before the step where they actually provide context for why they need to do it.

The creation of 'fuzzy context' is a non-linear correlation between context given, and follow-on questions not answered.ďťż

i.e., from my experience it's roughly an S-shaped curve.

null image

When only a small amount of detail is provided, the depth of the conversation is yet to be revealed, and so the degree of ambiguity is very high.

But after introducing a few of the details, you find yourself very quickly deep in the weeds of the problem—which requires a conscious effort to then reach a 'full' understanding (the red area on my chart).

I do this in real life sometimes too: I'll be recalling a story, casually mention a minor detail, realise what I've done, and then backtrack to add context as to why that detail is relevant in the first place.

The key is to not semi-explain a new concept. Be conscious of what follow-on questions you're creating.

2. A fresh start

The primary benefit of pre-filling information is that it'll often save the user time and effort.

But there are a few caveats to consider:

✏️

1. Is this going to be edited?

It can often be awkward to edit content that you haven't written, especially if it's split over many fields / pages.

✅

2. Is the information correct?

i.e., how close is the output to what the user would have entered themselves?

🧠

3. Does the act of inputting information serve as an educational tool?

Occasionally the process of entering information teaches the user how to do a particular repeatable task. This is a good reason not to bypass the data entry.

In this instance, creating a Google Ad falls within those first two caveats: the information is going to be edited, and has to be accurate.

i.e., nobody wants you to pre-fill an ad for them, if the resulting performance is terrible.

Or, if they get your business purpose totally wrong, which is what happened to me:

null image

To be clear, I'm not suggesting that you should never pre-fill information. But rather that pre-filling as a default, is a risky strategy.

The most punishing thing to get wrong is to be very inaccurate, and have pre-populated lots of fields.

null image

The difficulty for Google (and any company, really), is that it's hard to predict when you'll be correct, or not.

i.e., calculating the significance of false positives is tricky. It's even harder to then predict future errors for totally unrelated customers.

To mitigate this risk, I'd usually recommend a clear prompt to delete all of the data and let the user start fresh.

It both acts as a way for Google to learn when their data-population was incorrect (and useless), and allows the user to start again without penalty.

3. De-risk the click

When confirming that your campaign destination URL is correct, you essentially have two choices: back or next.

The problem with a CTA labelled 'back' is that it has different meanings, depending on the implementation—which the user has no implicit understanding of until they try.

Back to your account home? Back one step? Back to the start of a section? Back in black?

Will Back save your progress? Is it intended to be used as a way to navigate mid-process, or simply a way of returning to where you started?

This is why clear actions, and action-specific CTAs are effective at reducing anxiety.

null image

This helps to de-risk the click, which also plays into a user's desire for 🚦 Loss Aversion.

It's also something that you can implement broadly, across many products and services, with very little effort.

4. An escape route

When attempting to connect my Google Ad and Google Analytics accounts—i.e., to track the success of my campaign—I repeatedly hit an error.

null image

Errors happen and I understand the inevitability.

But if you try and skip the integration, you're shown the default 'are you sure?' pop-up.

i.e., despite being unable to continue, you're warned about the risks of skipping—which include underperforming ads.

null image

The user is forced to face their new reality: do they still want to invest in a marketing campaign, knowing that the performance will be worse?

It doesn't even matter what the comparative significance of the new reality is—the anchoring bias will make it feel disproportionately worse.

null image

I'm confident that in this scenario, Google could utilise an 'escape route' to decrease churn.

In other words, if the user has just hit an error, provide a means of skipping that step without the warning.

null image

I wouldn't recommend an escape route to every company, for every decision, because they require resources to do well.

But for an ad platform that transacts $200 billion every year, even decreasing the churn on the edge case scenarios becomes meaningful.

You’ve finished this study

+1

Become a BFM+ member to track your progress, create a library of content and share learnings within your team.

You’ve finished this study

Other studies picked for you

A masterclass in user activation (96% of them)

A masterclass in user activation (96% of them)

Discover the art of setting a goal and then using that to immediately create the perception of success.

The Complexity Paradox of ChatGPT, AI and UX

The Complexity Paradox of ChatGPT, AI and UX

As the underlying technology improves, interfaces like ChatGPT get harder to use. Does this explain the strategy for Apple Intelligence?

BFM+ Exclusive

Unlock all 75 case studies with BFM+

View Plans
What Audible Gets Wrong About Repeat Purchases

What Audible Gets Wrong About Repeat PurchasesPreview this content

How to create a flywheel of discovery, purchase and satisfaction that leads to repeat purchases.

All of the UX analysis on Built for Mars is original, and was researched and written by me, Peter Ramsey.

Never miss the free UX analysis

Free case studies, the moment they’re released, plus a digest of the best UX Bites every few weeks.