By Peter Ramsey

15 Aug 24

What Audible Gets Wrong About Repeat Purchases Company Logo
Audible9 min read
Listen

What Audible Gets Wrong About Repeat Purchases

What Audible Gets Wrong About Repeat Purchases Featured Image

Amazon owns Audible, so it's unsurprising that you can purchase an audiobook in a few clicks.

But, unlike Amazon, they're a few bad clicks.

UX is an art with thin margins. The difference between okay and epic can be a single line of context.

You're cooking with the same ingredients as everyone else, but yours just tastes better.

And unlike a subscription (a recurring purchase), you usually have to be proactive about designing and spinning a flywheel for repeat purchases.

I've designed and experimented on these set-ups with more than 100 different companies, on (at least) hundreds of millions of users.

Here are some techniques that have reliably worked for me.

Case study

Please rotate your device to view this slideshow

Note, this won’t work if ‘rotate: lock’ is on in your device settings.
567368
567369
567370
567371
567372
567373
567374
567375
567376
567377
567378
567379
567380
567381
567382
567383
567384
567385
567386
567387
567388
567389
567390
567391
567392
567393
567394
567395
567396
567397
567398
567399
567400
567401
567402
567403
567404
567405
567406
567407
567408
567409
567410
567411
567412
567413
567414
567415
567416
567417
567418
567419
567420
567421
567422
567423
567424
567425
567426
567427
567428
567429
567430
567431
567432
567433
567434
567435
567436
567437
567438
567439
567440
567441
567442
567443
567444
567445
567446
567447
567448
567449
567450
567451
567452
567453
567454
567455
567456
567457
567458
567459

👇

That’s all for the slideshow, but there’s more content and key takeaways below.

Slide 1 of 93

Diving even deeper

1. The flywheel

We've covered the process of buying a book, but what about turning the flywheel?

i.e., feeling a sense of ownership about your library, and using that to encourage another purchase.

If you're like me, you'll listen to books until the acknowledgements—the bit where the author thanks a bunch of people for putting up with them

Then you'll stop.

Although Audible breaks these out into chapters, they don't automatically mark a title as finished unless you've listened to the entire thing.

So my library is mostly unfinished books with a few seconds or minutes remaining. These will then be continuously recommended to me as the next thing for me to listen to.

null image

What happens next? I now entirely ignore my recommended feed.

I could manually mark them as finished, but I don't.

A behaviour that could be recognised by looking at data (percentage of "unfinished" books that only have the end credits left), effectively neutralises a major conversion opportunity for Audible.

A single oversight.

2. Framing or bragging

There are two main reasons why companies show analytics for individual usage:

🖼

1. To frame a silent benefit

Like the number of ads reduced on YouTube Premium

😎

2. Bragging rights

To tell your friends you’ve lifted 1000kg in the gym today

For example, people rarely brag about the number of ads they’ve not seen. Perhaps because they don't have a clear grasp of the alternative. The benefits are silent.

I suspect that Audible is a combination of the two. 

But through the simple criteria of framing or bragging, you can roughly judge how effectively these analytics are displayed.

In other words: does my implementation serve one, or both, of these goals?

Audible's barely works. 

Often the charts are outright broken. For example, look at my daily listening time:

null image

You have to tap to reveal the raw data, which then doesn't align to the bar chart at all.

And then conceptually they often miss the point.

If you click to view your listening time, it'll always show you today's analytics, even if you've got no data.

null image

Something to remember is that the default time frame for your analytics can make all the difference.

In Audible's instance, weekly or monthly would likely be better. But some apps benefit from a lifetime view.

At least it's not as bad as the badges...

3. Something to aim for

I've found that badges and achievements are considerably more effective if the user proactively works towards them.

For example; you've read 400 words of this article already, congratulations.

But you didn't feel much, did you?

Audible have taken a rare approach of turning their badges into riddles without any desire.

If you click on a locked achievement, you're shown a pop-up like these:

Riddle1
Riddle2

Typically this type of milestone would be used to encourage specific behaviours, like trying new features, or committing to repeat usage (streaks).

The concept is simple: nudge the actions that create stickier users.

But the vagueness doesn't tell you if it needs a day of effort, or a whole year. You'd need to look it up online first.

It's a style of hardcore grinding that will only appeal to a very small cohort of their users—and they're probably pretty dedicated anyway.

It's the rest of their audience that they need to nudge.

null image

P.S., If you're interested in how to make your badges, achievements and streaks way more effective, I've published an entire Cheatsheet on Gamification.

UX Exercise

Question 1 of 2
BFM+

YouTube Premium has a summary dashboard showing your usage.

Why do they do this?

Quiz Question Image
Bragging rights
You need to be a BFM+ member to use exercises
To encourage podcast listens
You need to be a BFM+ member to use exercises
To reduce Cognitive Drift
You need to be a BFM+ member to use exercises
To frame silent benefits
You need to be a BFM+ member to use exercises
Select an answer

You’ve finished this study

+1

Become a BFM+ member to track your progress, create a library of content and share learnings within your team.

You’ve finished this study

Other studies picked for you

A masterclass in user activation (96% of them)

A masterclass in user activation (96% of them)

Discover the art of setting a goal and then using that to immediately create the perception of success.

The Complexity Paradox of ChatGPT, AI and UX

The Complexity Paradox of ChatGPT, AI and UX

As the underlying technology improves, interfaces like ChatGPT get harder to use. Does this explain the strategy for Apple Intelligence?

BFM+ Exclusive

Unlock all 75 case studies with BFM+

View Plans
Is This Why Users Are Ignoring Your Features?

Is This Why Users Are Ignoring Your Features?Preview this content

Simple techniques to increase feature usage, retention and ultimately alter how users perceive the value of your product.

All of the UX analysis on Built for Mars is original, and was researched and written by me, Peter Ramsey.

Never miss the free UX analysis

Free case studies, the moment they’re released, plus a digest of the best UX Bites every few weeks.